Home Versus Hospital Rehabilitation of Older Adults Following Hip Fracture Yields Similar Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

The increase in hip fractures (HF) due to aging of the population and the rise in attractiveness of services provided at home following the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasize the need to compare outcomes of home versus hospital HF rehabilitation. To date, studies comparing the 2 services have focused primarily on clinical outcomes rather than patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This longitudinal observational study evaluated PROs of older adults with HF in the 2 settings. The SF36 questionnaire was used to measure PROs 3 times after surgery. The first PRO was retrospective and reflected pre-fracture health status. Descriptive statistics and mixed-effect logistic regression were used. Of 86 patients participating in the study, 41 had home rehabilitation and 45 had hospital rehabilitation. In both groups, the mental and physical scores plummeted 2 weeks after the HF, compared to pre-fracture status. The difference in improvement from pre-fracture status to recovery in both groups, were not significantly (P < .05) different, except for the pain domain. PROs of home versus hospital rehabilitation were similar, suggesting that rehabilitation at home can be as effective as hospital rehabilitation for suitable patients. This knowledge can improve quality of care in an aging global population.

Post-hip-fracture knee pain in older adults prolongs their hospital stays: A retrospective analysis using propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-hip-fracture knee pain (PHFKP) occurs in ∼28%-37% of patients and contributes to a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). Analyses of LOS prolongation due to PHFKP have been limited to univariate analyses that do not consider important confounding factors. After adjusting for important confounding factors, we investigated whether the presence or absence of PHFKP makes a difference in LOS in patients with hip fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who had undergone postoperative rehabilitation after surgery for a hip fracture. Demographic and clinical information, discharge parameters, and PHFKP development information were collected from the medical records. Using propensity score matching, we performed a two-group comparison of LOS, the functional independence measure (FIM) motor score (FIMm), FIMm gain, and FIMm effectiveness in patients with and without PHFKP. Six variables were included in the calculation of propensity scores: age, sex, body mass index, fracture type, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and independence in activities of daily living at discharge. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the details of the relationships between LOS and (i) the time of PHFKP development and (ii) pain intensity. RESULTS: We analyzed the cases of 261 patients, of whom 87 (33.3%) developed PHFKP. In propensity score matching, 80 patients were each matched to a patient in the PHFKP or non-PHFKP group. After propensity score matching, a between-group comparison revealed that the PHFKP group had a longer LOS (+11 days) than the non-PHFKP group, and there were no differences in FIMm gain or FIMm effectiveness. The timing of PHFKP development and pain intensity were not related to the LOS. DISCUSSION: Even after adjusting for confounders, the development of PHFKP was found to prolong LOS. Clinicians should be aware of possible LOS prolongation in hip fracture patients with PHFKP.

Variation in care and outcomes for people after hip fracture with and without cognitive impairment; results from the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry.

BACKGROUND: People with dementia have poorer outcomes after hip fracture and this may be due in part to variation in care. We aimed to compare care and outcomes for people with and without cognitive impairment after hip fracture. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry data for people ≥50 years of age who underwent hip fracture surgery (n = 49,063). Cognitive impairment or known dementia and cognitively healthy groups were defined using preadmission cognitive status. Descriptive statistics and multivariable mixed effects models were used to compare groups. RESULTS: In general, cognitively impaired people had worse care and outcomes compared to cognitively healthy older people. A lower proportion of the cognitively impaired group had timely pain assessment (≤30 min of presentation: 61% vs 68%; p < 0.0001), were given the opportunity to mobilise (89% vs 93%; p < 0.0001) and achieved day-1 mobility (34% vs 58%; p < 0.0001) than the cognitively healthy group. A higher proportion of the cognitively impaired group had delayed pain management (>30 mins of presentation: 26% vs 20%; p < 0.0001), were malnourished (27% vs 15%; p < 0.0001), had delirium (44% vs 13%; p < 0.0001) and developed a new pressure injury (4% vs 3%; p < 0.0001) than the cognitively healthy group. Fewer of the cognitively impaired group received rehabilitation (35% vs 64%; p < 0.0001), particularly patients from RACFs (16% vs 39%; p < 0.0001) and were prescribed bone protection medication on discharge (24% vs 27%; p < 0.0001). Significantly more of the cognitively impaired group had a new transfer to residential care (46% vs 11% from private residence; p < 0.0001) and died at 30-days (7% vs 3% from private residence; 15% vs 10% from RACF; both p < 0.0001). In multivariable models adjusting for covariates with facility as the random effect, the cognitively impaired group had a greater odds of being malnourished, not achieving day-1 walking, having delirium in the week after surgery, dying within 30 days, and in those from private residences, having a new transfer to a residential care facility than the cognitively healthy group. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified several aspects of care that could be improved for patients with cognitive impairment - management of pain, mobility, nutrition and bone health, as well as delirium assessment, prevention and management strategies and access to rehabilitation. Further research is needed to determine whether improvements in care will reduce hospital complications and improve outcomes for people with dementia after hip fracture.

Boosting inpatient exercise after hip fracture using an alternative workforce: a mixed methods implementation evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture has a devastating impact on individuals and is an increasing burden for health systems and society. Compared to usual care, increased physiotherapy provision has demonstrated efficacy in improving patient and health service outcomes in this population. However, physiotherapy workforce challenges prevent sustained implementation. METHODS: Our aim was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and implementation cost of thrice daily physiotherapy for patients in the acute care setting after hip fracture at two public hospitals. We added twice-daily exercise implemented by an alternative workforce, to usual care consisting of daily mobility practice by a physiotherapist. Sites identified their preferred alternative workforce, with pre-registration physiotherapy students and allied health assistants chosen. We used a mixed methods approach, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a determinant framework to guide implementation planning and data collection. We compared hospital length of stay data to a reference cohort. RESULTS: We recruited 25 patients during the study period. Acute care hospital length of stay decreased from 11 days in the reference cohort to 8 days in the BOOST cohort (mean difference - 3.3 days, 95%CI -5.4 to -1.2 days, p = 0.003). Intervention fidelity was 72% indicating feasibility, no safety concerns were attributed to the intervention, and uptake was 96% of all eligible patients. The intervention was acceptable to patients, carers and healthcare providers. This intervention was cost-effective from the acute orthopaedic service perspective. CONCLUSION: Higher daily frequency of physiotherapy can be safely, feasibly and effectively implemented by an alternative workforce for patients in the acute care setting following hip fracture surgery.

Movement Patterns in Older Adults Recovering From Hip Fracture.

The aim of this study was to quantify physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults recovering from hip fracture and to identify groups based on movement patterns. In this cross-sectional cohort study, older adults (≥70 years) were included 3 months after surgery for proximal femoral fracture. Patients received an accelerometer for 7 days. Demographics and outcomes related to physical function, mobility, cognitive functions, quality of life, and hip fracture were assessed. In total, 43 patients with sufficient accelerometer wear time were included. Across all groups, participants engaged in very low levels of physical activity, spending an average of 11 hr/day in prolonged sedentary behavior. Based on the extracted components from a principal component analysis, three groups with substantial differences in levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior could be distinguished.

HIP fracture Supplemental Therapy to Enhance Recovery (HIPSTER): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures result in substantial health impacts for patients and costs to health systems. Many patients require prolonged hospital stays and up to 60% do not regain their prefracture level of mobility within 1 year. Physical rehabilitation plays a key role in regaining physical function and independence; however, there are no recommendations regarding the optimal intensity. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of early intensive in-hospital physiotherapy compared with usual care in patients who have had surgery following a hip fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This two-arm randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded trial will recruit 620 participants who have had surgery following a hip fracture from eight hospitals. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive usual care (physiotherapy according to usual practice at the site) or intensive physiotherapy in the hospital over the first 7 days following surgery (two additional sessions per day, one delivered by a physiotherapist and the other by an allied health assistant). The primary outcome is the total hospital length of stay, measured from the date of hospital admission to the date of hospital discharge, including both acute and subacute hospital days. Secondary outcomes are functional mobility, health-related quality of life, concerns about falling, discharge destination, proportion of patients remaining in hospital at 30 days, return to preadmission mobility and residence at 120 days and adverse events. Twelve months of follow-up will capture data on healthcare utilisation. A cost-effectiveness evaluation will be undertaken, and a process evaluation will document barriers and facilitators to implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee has approved this protocol. The trial findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, submitted for presentation at conferences and disseminated to patients and carers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001442796.

Relationship between independence in activities of daily living at discharge and physical activity at admission of older postoperative hip fracture rehabilitation inpatients: A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hip fractures are associated with a reduction in activities of daily living (ADL) and require long-term care. The physical activity of patients with hip fractures is temporarily impaired immediately after surgery, causing difficulty in the measurement of physical activities at the time of rehabilitation admission. This study examined the relationship between ADL at discharge and light- and moderate-intensity physical activity at the time of rehabilitation admission by determining a cut-off value predicting ADL independence. METHODS: This retrospective case control study analyzed 43 postoperative hip fracture patients aged ≥65 years admitting into inpatient rehabilitation. ADL at discharge was assessed using the Functional Independent Measure motor items (FIM-m). The duration of physical activity at the time of rehabilitation admission was measured using an activity tracker equipped with an accelerometer. Prehospital frailty was evaluated using Clinical Frailty Scale. The relationship between these variables was examined using Spearman's product-moment correlation coefficient. Differences in physical activity between patients requiring and not requiring assistance with ADLs were examined using the analysis of covariance. A receiver operating characteristic curve of the need for ADL assistance at discharge was constructed from the duration of physical activity. RESULTS: The duration of physical activity at the time of rehabilitation admission was related to FIM-m at discharge. The cut-off value of the duration of physical activity for predicting the need for ADL assistance at discharge was 135 s, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 68.4% (area under the curve: 0.76). DISCUSSION: The duration of physical activity at the time of rehabilitation admission may be a factor that can quantitatively predict the risk of requiring assistance with ADLs at discharge in older hip fracture patients. The duration of light-and-moderate intensity physical activity may be a component of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation to improve patients' ADL.

Social participation, positive affect, and negative affect in postoperative patients with hip fractures: A cross-sectional study.

This study investigated the social participation, positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA) of patients with hip fractures after surgery and determined their possible predictive factors. We used a cross-sectional study design to recruit 154 participants with hip fractures post-surgery. Assessment tools included the Barthel Index, the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, the Assessment of Life Habits, and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Patients with better functioning in daily living activities experienced more social participation, higher PA, and lower NA. Patients with more positive automatic thoughts experienced more social participation and higher PA. Patients with more negative automatic thoughts experienced more social participation, lower PA, and higher NA. Early rehabilitation and psychosocial interventions should be provided for postoperative hip fracture patients to improve their activities of daily living and emotional well-being.

Orthopaedic Out of Bed Project (OOBP): improving early mobilisation following femoral fracture using a therapy-led education programme.

Delayed mobilisation following hip fracture surgery is detrimental to patients and health systems. Prolonged hospital stay additionally results in decreased function and increased mortality. Our hospital was underperforming against the national metric for mobilisation by the day after surgery and physiotherapists were the primary healthcare professionals expected to do this. The therapy team therefore undertook a service improvement to increase the number of patients mobilised by the day after their femoral fracture surgery. This was through a ward-based education programme aimed at increasing confidence and competence of the trauma ward healthcare assistants (HCAs) to complete this task when appropriate instead of physiotherapists.The model for improvement was used, with two Plan-Do-See-Act cycles completed between 2020 and 2022. On completion of the therapy-led intervention, the percentage of patients mobilised by the day after surgery was shown to have increased from a mean average of 60% in 2019 to 79% in 2022. The number of patients mobilised by HCAs prior to physiotherapy assessment increased from 2% prior to and 30% following the intervention.The programme improved HCA confidence and competence using a rehabilitation ethos to mobilise patients following hip fracture surgery. It also showed a clinically significant improvement in the percentage of patients with hip fracture mobilising by the day after surgery and a large increase in the number of patients mobilised by our trauma ward HCAs prior to an initial physiotherapy assessment. This work has demonstrated implications for orthopaedic trauma services and the patients who receive them. It reduces the single point of failure of relying on a physiotherapist to mobilise a patient through increasing multidisciplinary confidence and capability on the ward to perform the task. In turn, this increases physiotherapy capacity to provide acute rehabilitation, which is another important part of femoral fracture recovery.

Effects of rehabilitation therapy based on exercise prescription on motor function and complications after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Exercise rehabilitation training is an important measure for improving the prognosis of patients with hip fractures. However, the particular program that works effectively and the efficiency of exercise therapy are still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of usual postoperative care combined with rehabilitation based on exercise prescription on motor function and complications in elderly patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture. METHODS: This was an observational study. A total of 71 elderly patients with hip fractures who were treated with hip arthroplasty and internal fixation of the proximal femur with an intramedullary nail at Suzhou Municipal Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021 were included; 11 cases were excluded (eight cases were excluded due to loss of follow-up, two due to deaths from other causes, and one due to other reasons). Finally, 60 patients (18 males and 42 females) were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the control (n = 30) and experimental (n = 30) groups using a random number generator. Patients in the control group received usual postoperative care, whereas those in the experimental group received usual postoperative care combined with rehabilitation training based on the principles of exercise prescription. We recorded the motor function (Harris hip score), daily living ability (Barthel Index), and complications at discharge and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The Harris hip score and Barthel Index score were significantly higher at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively than at discharge in both groups (p < 0.05). The Harris hip score and Barthel Index score at discharge and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence of complications at 6 months postoperatively was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (13% vs. 37%). CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation therapy based on exercise prescription helps improve hip function and the ability to perform activities of daily living and related postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. The findings of our study will guide decision-making in clinical practice and improve the clinical management of hip fractures in elderly patients postoperatively.

A multidisciplinary approach to post-operative fragility hip fracture care in Thailand - a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate care and rehabilitation following surgery for fragility hip fractures in older adults is associated with better outcomes and a greater likelihood of achieving pre-injury functioning. Clinical guidelines specifically for the post-operative care and rehabilitation of patients with hip fractures are scarce; as such, country-specific protocols benchmarked against established guidelines are essential given the wide variation in cultures and beliefs, clinical practice and diverse healthcare systems in Asia. We aimed to provide clinically relevant recommendations for post-operative fragility hip fracture care and rehabilitation to improve patient outcomes and prevent subsequent fractures in Thailand. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify key evidence on various elements of post-hip fracture care and rehabilitation. Further discussions at a meeting and over email correspondence led to the development of the recommendations which amalgamate available evidence with the clinical experience of the multidisciplinary expert panel. RESULTS: Our recommendations are categorized by one period domain - acute post-operative period, and five major domains during the post-operative period - rehabilitation, optimization of bone health, prevention of falls, nutritional supplementation, and prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. A multidisciplinary approach should be central to the rehabilitation process with the involvement of orthopedists, geriatricians/internists, physiatrists, physical and occupational therapists, endocrinologists, pharmacists and nursing staff. Other key components of our recommendations which we believe contribute to better functional outcomes in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery include comprehensive pre-operative assessments, early surgery, goal setting for recovery and rehabilitation, early mobilization, medication optimization, tailored exercise plans, adequate coverage with analgesia, assessment and appropriate management of osteoporosis with due consideration of the fracture risk, fall prevention plans, and nutritional assessment and support. Patients and their caregivers should be a part of the recovery process at every step, and they should be counseled and educated appropriately, particularly on the importance of adherence to their rehabilitation plan. CONCLUSION: We have provided guidance on the critical domains of clinical care in the post-operative setting to optimize patient outcomes and prevent fracture recurrence. Our recommendations for post-operative care and rehabilitation of older adults with hip fracture can serve as a framework for hospitals across Thailand.

Predictive factors for home discharge after femoral fracture surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures require protracted hospitalization and often preclude return to pre-fracture levels of mobility, function and prior residential status following hospital discharge. Early prediction of rehabilitation and discharge potential in patients with femoral fracture would optimize discharge planning. AIM: To identify predictive factors of discharge destination during the early phase of femoral fracture rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort design. SETTING: Acute and postoperative rehabilitation hospital settings. POPULATION: Data from 109 participants (65 women [59.6%]) admitted for unilateral femoral fracture were included. METHODS: Sociodemographic information, hip pain severity during gait (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), mobility (Elderly Mobility Scale), activities of daily living (Modified Barthel Index), cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), exercise self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale), amount of physiotherapy received, and caregiver availability were assessed pre- and/or postoperatively. Discharge destination was assessed via telephone interviews 6 weeks after discharge from acute care. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine optimal cut-off scores for all outcomes based on discharge destination. Outcomes demonstrating a significant area under the curve were entered as dichotomous independent variables (i.e., above or below ROC-derived cut-off values) in subsequent logistic regression analyses to determine predictors of discharge destination. RESULTS: SEE Score ≥53 (odds ratio [OR]=5.975, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.674-21.333, P=0.006), female sex (OR=3.421, 95% CI=1.187-9.861, P=0.023), ≥8 physiotherapy sessions (OR=4.633, 95% CI=1.559-13.771, P=0.006), MMSE Score ≥17 (OR=3.374, 95% CI=1.047-10.873, P=0.042), and caregiver availability (OR=3.766, 95% CI=1.133-12.520, P=0.030) were identified as significant predictors of home discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise self-efficacy, female sex, more physiotherapy rehabilitation training, better pre-operative cognitive function, and caregiver availability emerged as important predictors of home discharge following femoral fracture. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: These findings are highly translational and may be useful for informing clinical guidelines and policy decisions regarding rehabilitation potential and discharge pathway selection during early hospitalization following femoral fracture surgery.

Perioperative interventions to improve early mobilisation and physical function after hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative interventions could enhance early mobilisation and physical function after hip fracture surgery. OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of perioperative interventions on early mobilisation and physical function after hip fracture. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from January 2000 to March 2022. English language experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included if patients were hospitalised for a fractured proximal femur with a mean age 65 years or older and reported measures of early mobilisation and physical function during the acute hospital admission. Data were pooled using a random effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included from 1,327 citations. Studies were conducted in 26 countries on 8,192 participants with a mean age of 80 years. Pathways and models of care may provide a small increase in early mobilisation (standardised mean difference [SMD]: 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.39, I2 = 73%) and physical function (SMD: 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, I2 = 0%) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation analgesia may provide a moderate improvement in function (SMD: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.24-1.05, I2 = 96%). The benefit of pre-operative mobilisation, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, recumbent cycling and clinical supervision on mobilisation and function remains uncertain. Evidence of no effect on mobilisation or function was identified for pre-emptive analgesia, intraoperative periarticular injections, continuous postoperative epidural infusion analgesia, occupational therapy training or nutritional supplements. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative interventions may improve early mobilisation and physical function after hip fracture surgery. Future studies are needed to model the causal mechanisms of perioperative interventions on mobilisation and function after hip fracture.

Ambulation Distance Within 72 Hours after Surgical Management Is a Predictor of 90-Day Ambulatory Capacity in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The inability to mobilize after surgical intervention for hip fractures in the elderly is established as a risk factor for greater morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have evaluated the association between the timing and distance of ambulation in the postoperative acute care phase with postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between ambulatory distance in the acute postoperative setting and ambulatory capacity at 3 months. METHODS: Patients aged 65 and older who were ambulatory at baseline and underwent surgical intervention for hip fractures from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Consistent with previous literature, patients were divided into two groups: those who were able to ambulate 5 feet within 72 hours after surgical fixation (early ambulatory) and those who were not (minimally ambulatory). RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients (84 early ambulatory and 86 minimally ambulatory) were available for analysis. Using a multivariable ordinal logistic regression model, variables found to be statistically significant predictors of ambulatory status at 3 months were the ability to ambulate five feet in 72 hours (P < 0.0001), ambulatory distance at discharge (P = 0.012), and time from presentation to surgery (P = 0.039). Patients who were able to ambulate 5 feet within 72 hours had 9 times the odds of being independent ambulators rather than a lower ambulatory class (cane, walker, and nonambulatory). Pertrochanteric fractures were less likely than femoral neck fractures to independently ambulate at 3 months (17.2% vs. 42.3%; P = 0.0006). DISCUSSION: Ambulating 5 feet within 72 hours after hip fracture surgery is associated with an increased likelihood of independent ambulation at 3 months postoperatively. This simple and clear goal may be used to help enhance postoperative mobility and independence while providing a metric to guide therapy and help counsel patients and families.

Patterns of physical activity over time in older patients rehabilitating after hip fracture surgery: a preliminary observational study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate patterns of continuously monitored physical activity in older patients rehabilitating after hip fracture surgery and the association with patient characteristics. METHODS: Physical activity of surgically treated hip fracture patients aged 70 years or older, who were rehabilitating at a skilled nursing home, was continuously monitored using a tri-axial accelerometer. The intensity of physical activity per day was calculated from the accelerometer signals to describe the daily physical activity levels of the enrolled patients. The patterns of three different aspects of physical activity were investigated: overall physical activity, overall variability, and day-to-day variability. Two experts in the geriatric rehabilitation field helped identifying unique physical activity patterns for each aspect based on visual analysis. Eighteen healthcare professionals independently classified each patient in one of the predefined patterns for each aspect. Differences between physical activity patterns and patient characteristics were assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: Physical activity data from 66 older patients were used in this preliminary study. A total of six unique patterns were identified for overall physical activity and overall variability, and five unique patterns for the day-to-day variability. The most common pattern found for the overall physical activity and day-to-day variability had a S-shape, which first slowly increased, then steeply increased, and subsequently flattened (n = 23, 34.8%). A N-shape pattern was found the most common pattern for overall variability, which first slowly increased, then steeply increased, then decreased and lastly increased (n = 14, 21.2%). The functionality at admission to rehabilitation, measured with the Barthel Index, and the duration of rehabilitation stay differed between the patterns of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple patterns of physical activity among older patients during hip fracture rehabilitation were found in this preliminary study. The functionality at admission to rehabilitation and the duration of rehabilitation stay were associated with the different patterns found in this study. Results of this study highlight the importance of personalized hip fracture treatment.

Association of Social Support with Rehabilitation Outcome among Older Adults with Hip Fracture Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study at Post-Acute Care Facility in Asia.

OBJECTIVES: There is growing interest in the role of social support during the recovery after hip fractures. The research to date has been mainly focused on structural support, with few studies concerned with functional support. This study examined the effects of both functional and structural aspects of social support on rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with hip fracture surgery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive older adults (≥60 years) with hip fracture surgery who underwent inpatient rehabilitation in a post-acute care facility in Singapore between January 11, 2021, and October 30, 2021 (n = 112). METHODS: We administered the Medical Outcome Study-Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) to assess perceived functional support of patients and used living arrangement as an indicator for structural support. Participants were followed up over the inpatient stay at the post-acute care facility until discharge; thereafter, rehabilitation efficiency (REy) and rehabilitation effectiveness (REs) were evaluated. Multiple linear regressions were performed to examine the associations of MOS-SSS score and living arrangement with REy and REs, respectively, adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidity, body mass index, prefracture function, type of fracture, and length of stay. RESULTS: Perceived functional support had positive associations with rehabilitation outcomes. A 1-unit increase in MOS-SSS total score was associated with 0.15 units (95% CI 0.03-0.3, P = .029) greater gain in physical function after a typical 1-month stay, and 0.21 units (95% CI 0.01-0.41, P = .040) higher achievement in potential functional improvement upon discharge. In contrast, no association was observed between structural support and rehabilitation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Perceived functional support may significantly impact the recovery of older adults with hip fracture during the inpatient rehabilitation process, independent of structural support. Our findings suggest the potential of incorporating interventions enhancing perceived functional support of patients into the post-acute care model for hip fracture.

A qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of patients living with mild, moderate and severe frailty, following hip fracture surgery and hospitalisation.

It is well recognised that hip fracture surgery is associated with a negative impact on short and long-term post-operative physical health and emotional well-being for patients. Furthermore, these patients are known to be frail with multiple co-morbidities. This study explores how frailty shapes the lived experiences of rehabilitation and recovery for patients who have undergone hip fracture surgery. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen participants, recently discharged from hospital following hip fracture surgery. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was applied to explore the lived experiences of frail patients and ascertain important themes. Patient experiences were captured in seven overarching themes: 1) the hospital as a place of "safety", 2) placing trust in others, 3) the slow recovery journey impeded by attitude and support, 4) maintaining autonomy and dignity whilst feeling vulnerable, 5) seeking a new normal, 6) loneliness and social isolation and 7) the ageing body. Based on our study findings, we have been able to suggest a number of opportunities to improve support for frailer patients in finding a new routine to their everyday lives, these include on-going physical and psychological support, information and education and a robust pathway for transition of care into the community. A conceptual thematic diagram is presented which helps to understand the experience and the complex needs of frail older people undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Post-surgery interventions for hip fracture: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Interventions provided after hip fracture surgery have been shown to reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes. While some systematic studies have evaluated the efficacy of post-surgery interventions, there lacks a systematically rigorous examination of all the post-surgery interventions which allows healthcare providers to easily identify post-operative interventions most pertinent to patient's recovery. OBJECTIVES: We aim to provide an overview of the available evidence on post-surgery interventions provided in the acute, subacute and community settings to improve outcomes for patients with hip fractures. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). We included articles that were (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (2) involved post-surgery interventions that were conducted in the acute, subacute or community settings and (3) conducted among older patients above 65 years old with any type of non-pathological hip fracture that was surgically treated, and who were able to walk without assistance prior to the fracture. We excluded (1) non-English language articles, (2) abstract-only publications, (3) articles with only surgical interventions, (4) articles with interventions that commenced pre-surgery or immediately upon completion of surgery or blood transfusion, (5) animal studies. Due to the large number of RCTs identified, we only included "good quality" RCTs with Jadad score ≥ 3 for data extraction and synthesis. RESULTS: Our literature search has identified 109 good quality RCTs on post-surgery interventions for patients with fragility hip fractures. Among the 109 RCTs, 63% of the identified RCTs (n = 69) were related to rehabilitation or medication/nutrition supplementation, with the remaining RCTs focusing on osteoporosis management, optimization of clinical management, prevention of venous thromboembolism, fall prevention, multidisciplinary approaches, discharge support, management of post-operative anemia as well as group learning and motivational interviewing. For the interventions conducted in inpatient and outpatient settings investigating medication/nutrition supplementation, all reported improvement in outcomes (ranging from reduced postoperative complications, reduced length of hospital stay, improved functional recovery, reduced mortality rate, improved bone mineral density and reduced falls), except for a study investigating anabolic steroids. RCTs involving post-discharge osteoporosis care management generally reported improved osteoporosis management except for a RCT investigating multidisciplinary post-fracture clinic led by geriatrician with physiotherapist and occupational therapist. The trials investigating group learning and motivational interviewing also reported positive outcome respectively. The other interventions yielded mixed results. The interventions in this review had minor or no side effects reported. CONCLUSIONS: The identified RCTs regarding post-surgery interventions were heterogeneous in terms of type of interventions, settings and outcome measures. Combining interventions across inpatient and outpatient settings may be able to achieve better outcomes such as improved physical function recovery and improved nutritional status recovery. For example, nutritional supplementation could be made available for patients who have undergone hip fracture surgery in the inpatient settings, followed by post-discharge outpatient osteoporosis care management. The findings from this review can aid in clinical practice by allowing formulation of thematic program with combination of interventions as part of bundled care to improve outcome for patients who have undergone hip fracture surgery.

Barriers and facilitators of weight bearing after hip fracture surgery among older adults. A scoping review.

PURPOSE: This scoping review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on barriers and facilitators of weight bearing after hip fracture surgery in older adults. METHODS: Published (Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro) and unpublished (Global Health, EThOS, WorldCat dissertation and thesis, ClinicalTrials.gov , OpenAIRE, DART-Europe) evidence was electronically searched from database inception to 29 March 2022. Barriers and facilitators of weight bearing were extracted and synthesised into patient, process (non-surgical), process (surgical), and structure-related barriers/facilitators using a narrative review approach. RESULTS: In total, 5594 were identified from the primary search strategy, 1314 duplicates were removed, 3769 were excluded on title and abstract screening, and 442 were excluded on full-text screening. In total, 69 studies (all from published literature sources) detailing 47 barriers and/or facilitators of weight bearing were included. Of barriers/facilitators identified, 27 were patient-, 8 non-surgical process-, 8 surgical process-, and 4 structure-related. Patient facilitators included anticoagulant, home discharge, and aid at discharge. Barriers included preoperative dementia and delirium, postoperative delirium, pressure sores, indoor falls, ventilator dependence, haematocrit < 36%, systemic sepsis, and acute renal failure. Non-surgical process facilitators included early surgery, early mobilisation, complete medical co-management, in-hospital rehabilitation, and patient-recorded nurses' notes. Barriers included increased operative time and standardised hip fracture care. Surgical process facilitators favoured intramedullary fixations and arthroplasty over extramedullary fixation. Structure facilitators favoured more recent years and different healthcare systems. Barriers included pre-holiday surgery and admissions in the first quarter of the year. CONCLUSION: Most patient/surgery-related barriers/facilitators may inform future risk stratification. Future research should examine additional process/structure barriers and facilitators amenable to intervention. Furthermore, patient barriers/facilitators need to be investigated by replicating the studies identified and augmenting them with more specific details on weight bearing outcomes.